|
|
Compensation for damage caused by exercise of public authority and public administration
Varmuža, Martin ; Pítrová, Lenka (advisor) ; Svoboda, Petr (referee)
Responsibility for damages caused by the execution of public authority and public administration and compensation for such acts is a surprisingly layered issue. When tackling this, it is vital to start with the general discourse, especially with emphasis on the teleological basis of the issue in the legal system as a whole. Only by working in this manner is it possible to address the current unanswered questions that surpass into legal philosophy - mainly the issue of lawmaker's responsibility for the content of his work. This area, together with a brief historical introduction is part of this thesis to ensure its comprehensiveness. The focus of this text lies in the presentation of the institutes found in the Act no. 82/1998 Sb., about the responsibility for damages caused by the execution of public authority and public administration. This issue is addressed comprehensively during the course of this thesis. I try to tackle the conditions for the invocation of the responsibility clauses, its character and the subjects of the relation among others. I also mention various problematic passages found in the Act and possible ways of improvement.
|
|
|
Liability for Damage Caused by Exercise of Public Authority Focusing on the Institute of Regress Damages
Vyskočilová, Martina ; Sládeček, Vladimír (referee)
Liability for Damage Caused by Exercise of Public Authority Focusing on the Institute of Regress Damages This thesis focuses on liability for damage caused by exercise of public authority with an emphasis on the institute of regress damages as stipulated by Act. No. 82/1998 Sb. The institute of regress is emphasized throughout my paper as the fundamental research questions are: How is the institute expressed by positive law? Is it being used or is it only an empty provision? And how exactly is it being used? What is the success rate? If it is not used, what are possible reasons? The text is divided into four parts with subparts of first and second level. First part analyzes the key terms such as liability, damage, public authority and its entities. There is a disctinction between the public authority entity, who is liable for the damage, and the actual bodies, who exercise the authority. I also included a brief subchapter related to damage caused by lawful exercise of public authority. Second part analyzes how liability for damage caused by public authority is enshrined in the Czech Republic. First I addressed constitutional and international aspects, followed by provisions of Act. No. 82/1998 Sb., which is the foundation stone of the regulation. Third part is dedicated to the institute of regress...
|
|
|
Liability for Damage Caused by Exercise of Public Authority Focusing on the Institute of Regress Damages
Vyskočilová, Martina ; Pítrová, Lenka (advisor) ; Kopecký, Martin (referee)
Liability for Damage Caused by Exercise of Public Authority Focusing on the Institute of Regress Damages This thesis focuses on liability for damage caused by exercise of public authority with an emphasis on the institute of regress damages as stipulated by Act. No. 82/1998 Sb. The institute of regress is emphasized throughout my paper as the fundamental research questions are: How is the institute expressed by positive law? Is it being used or is it only an empty provision? And how exactly is it being used? What is the success rate? If it is not used, what are possible reasons? The text is divided into four parts with subparts of first and second level. First part analyzes the key terms such as liability, damage, public authority and its entities. There is a disctinction between the public authority entity, who is liable for the damage, and the actual bodies, who exercise the authority. I also included a brief subchapter related to damage caused by lawful exercise of public authority. Second part analyzes how liability for damage caused by public authority is enshrined in the Czech Republic. First I addressed constitutional and international aspects, followed by provisions of Act. No. 82/1998 Sb., which is the foundation stone of the regulation. Third part is dedicated to the institute of regress...
|
|
|
Compensation for damage caused by exercise of public authority and public administration
Varmuža, Martin ; Pítrová, Lenka (advisor) ; Svoboda, Petr (referee)
Responsibility for damages caused by the execution of public authority and public administration and compensation for such acts is a surprisingly layered issue. When tackling this, it is vital to start with the general discourse, especially with emphasis on the teleological basis of the issue in the legal system as a whole. Only by working in this manner is it possible to address the current unanswered questions that surpass into legal philosophy - mainly the issue of lawmaker's responsibility for the content of his work. This area, together with a brief historical introduction is part of this thesis to ensure its comprehensiveness. The focus of this text lies in the presentation of the institutes found in the Act no. 82/1998 Sb., about the responsibility for damages caused by the execution of public authority and public administration. This issue is addressed comprehensively during the course of this thesis. I try to tackle the conditions for the invocation of the responsibility clauses, its character and the subjects of the relation among others. I also mention various problematic passages found in the Act and possible ways of improvement.
|
|
|
Liability for damage caused by unlawful decisions or maladministration
Košťálová, Jana ; Pohl, Tomáš (advisor) ; Macková, Alena (referee)
Liability for damage caused by unlawful decision or maladministration The concept of liability for damage is one of the basic institutions of private and public law. Civil liability for damage provides protection for property and personal relations of natural persons and legal entities. Liability for damage is formed by a fulfilment of conditions stipulated by law. The aim of this liability is to eliminate the consequences of breaking the law and to prevent the occurrence of damage through pre-emption. As a topic of my thesis, I have chosen the specific case of civil liability which is the liability for damage caused by unlawful decision or maladministration. I will specifically focus on the liability of the state for damages caused by execution of public authority, where the state acts as a public entity in a legal relationship. The aim of state liabilty caused by execution of public authority is to provide legal certainty to parties in a legal relationship. If damage is caused as per the conditions defined by law, the aim of state liability for damage i salso remove any unwanted consequences of breaking law. Last but not the least, the function of state liability for damage caused by execution of public authority is to prevent the damages in the first place. In my thesis I provide a comprehensive...
|
|
|
The influence of compensations for damages occurring during tax administrative procedure on administrative expenses
Divišová, Tereza ; Vančurová, Alena (advisor) ; Pšurná, Pavla (referee)
This diploma thesis deals with compensation for damages occurring during tax administrative procedure due to maladministration or unlawful decisions. The main aim of this thesis was to disclose influence of compensations for damages and administrative expenses of compensation procedure to the state's budget. Thesis concerns legal frame of compensations for damages, the first part of the compensation procedure which is held by the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, specifically analysis of number of submitted applications for compensation, extent of acknowledged compensations and the most frequent reasons for acknowledgement of compensation. Further thesis deals with court proceedings and recourse against civil servants, which are eligible of causing damages. Significant part of thesis focuses to the estimation of administrative expenses spent in connection with compensation procedure and compares these expenses in years 2010 and 2011 considering the change in organization of state administration since 1. 1. 2011.
|
guest ::
